Ética, Filosofía Política y Filosofía del Derecho
Dudas razonables,sesgo cognitivo y emociones en la argumentación jurídica. El caso de Doce hombres sin piedad
Published
December 30, 2010
Keywords:
Cognitive biases, Doubt, Emotions, Fallacies, Legal argumentation, Films
How to Cite
Navarro, M. G. (2010). Dudas razonables,sesgo cognitivo y emociones en la argumentación jurídica. El caso de Doce hombres sin piedad. Bajo Palabra, (5), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2010.5.017
Copyright (c) 2010 M. G. Navarro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Concepts as reasonable doubt, cognitive biases and emotions are now a theoretical problem for the practice of law, and the law understood as legal argumentation. From a theoretical point of view, the screenplay written by Reginald Rose, Twelve Angry Men, is an outstanding example to analyze some of these concepts, and its influence on procedural stage. Cognitive biases and informal fallacies are theoretical challenge to legal argumentation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.