No. 20 (2020): Special Issue: Teaching Argumentation in Brazil and Argentina
Artículos

The construction of viewpoints in school writing: The production of the open letter discursive gender

Isabel Cristina Michelan de Azevedo
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Jussara dos Santos Matos
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Published June 23, 2020

Keywords:

argumentation, argumentativeness, discursive production, argumentative operators
How to Cite
Michelan de Azevedo, I. C., & dos Santos Matos, J. (2020). The construction of viewpoints in school writing: The production of the open letter discursive gender. Revista Iberoamericana De Argumentación, (20), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.15366/ria2020.20.005

Abstract

This article discusses how to promote the construction of points of view among 9th grade elementary school students, who are enrolled in a public school in Sergipe, Brazil, when they positioned themselves in relation to social problems that affected their lives. As it is considered a category that is at the center of the dialogue (RABATEL, 2005), the point of view shows a crossing of perspectives, therefore, it can be developed based on different linguistic resources, among which are the implicit construction strategies and the direction of argumentative operators, which are linked to communicative purposes. The results obtained, through an action investigation, are the result of the articulation between the teaching practices and the productions of the students carried out in class. It was observed that students find it easy to establish relationships between texts and social contexts, but have difficulty understanding and using the linguistic elements that collaborate with the organization of a discursive position. However, this did not prevent students from participating in language practices in which they had to explain positions on social problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amorin, M. (2006). “Cronotopo e exotopia”. En: B. Brait (Ed.). Bakhtin: outros conceitos-chave (pp. 95-114). São Paulo: Contexto.

Bajtín, M. (1997). “Hacia uma filosofia del acto ético”. En: M. Bajtín, Hacia uma filosofía del acto ético. De los borradores y otros escritos (pp. 7-81). Rubí, Barcelona.

Bajtín, M. (2015). Yo también soy. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Godot.

Bakhtin, M. (2003). Estética da criação verbal. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

Bakhtin, M. (2010). Para uma filosofia do ato responsável. São Carlos: Pedro & João Editores.

Barbisan, M. H. B. F y Teixeira, M. (2002). “Polifonia: origem e evolução do conceito em Oswald Ducrot”. Organon 16/32-33, 161-180. Disponible en: http://twixar.me/11k3. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.29792

Bezerra, P. (2015). “Breve glossário de alguns conceitos-chave”. En: M. Bakhtin, Teoria do romance I. A estilística (pp. 243-249). São Paulo: Editora 34.

Bubnova, T. (2015). “Prólogo”. En: M. Bajtín, Yo también soy (pp. 7-20). Buenos Aires: Ediciones Godot.

Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

Goodwin, J. (2005). “What does Arguing look Like?”. Informal Logic 25/1, 79-93. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v25i1.1046

Grácio, R.A. (2013). Vocabulário crítico de argumentação. Coimbra: Grácio Editor.

Grácio, R.A. (2016). Reflexões sobre o ensino da argumentação. En: Seminário de Pesquisa. São Cristóvão: Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 2016. vídeo (32 min). Color. Disponible en: http://twixar.me/m1k3.

Koch, I.V. (1992). A inter-ação pela linguagem. São Paulo: Contexto.

Rabatel, A. (2013). “O papel do enunciador na construção interacional dos pontos de vista”. En: W. Emediato (Ed.). A construção da opinião na mídia (pp. 19-66). Belo Horizonte: FALE/UFMG.

Rabatel, A. (2016). Homo Narrans: por uma abordagem enunciativa e interacionista da narrativa: pontos de vista e lógica da narração teórica e análise. São Paulo: Cortez.

Tripp, D. (2005). “Pesquisa-ação: uma introdução metodológica”. Educação e Pesquisa 31/3, 443-466. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022005000300009