Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta uma proposta de um Modelo de Avaliação de Alunos para a Justiça Social, que busca dar mais um passo na construção de uma educação que contribua para uma real e profunda transformação da sociedade. O modelo é baseado em três fontes principais. Por um lado, parte de um conceito de justiça social multidimensional, sentado sobre a Justiça social como redistribuição, reconhecimento e, como participação. A segunda fonte é uma proposta de Educação para a Justiça Social construída a partir do conceito anterior, o que diferencia uma formação em educação na Justiça Social de uma educação para a Justiça Social e que consiste em três pilares complementares: uma educação equitativa, democrática e crítica. Finalmente, a proposta bebe e aprender com abordagens alternativas para a avaliação do aluno: avaliação Inclusiva, Autêntica, Culturalmente sensível, Participativa, Democrática-deliberativa e Critica. Com tudo isso formulamos o modelo tridimensional: Avaliação equitativa, a avaliação participativa e avaliação crítica. Esta proposta tem como objetivo trazer ideias para começar a transformar a avaliação dos alunos de uma maneira que a configure como uma parte fundamental de uma educação comprometida com a construção de uma sociedade mais justa e inclusiva.
Downloads
Referências
Adams M., Bell, L. A. y Griffin P. (2007). Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice. Nueva York, NY: Routledge.
Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S. y West, M. (2013). Developing equitable education systems. Nueva York: Routledge.
Aitken, N. y Pungur, L. (2001). Authentic Assessment. Recuperado de http://education.alberta.ca/apps/aisi/literature/pdfs/AuthenticAssessmentUofAbUofL.PDF
Allman, P. (2001). Critical education against global capitalism: Karl Marx and revolutionary critical education. Londres: Bergin and Garvey.
Álvarez Méndez, J. M. (2001). Evaluar para conocer, examinar para excluir. Madrid: Morata.
Apple, M. W. (1986). Ideología y currículo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
Apple, M. W. y Beane, J. A. (1995). Democratic schools. Alexandria, VI: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ayers, W., Quinn, T. M. y Stovall, D. (2009). Handbook of social justice in education. Londres: Routledge.
Belavi, G. y Murillo, F. J. (2016). Educación, democracia y justicia social. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 5(1), 13-34. doi:10.15336/riejs2016.5.1
Bell, B. y Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science education, 85(5), 536-553. doi:10.1002/sce.1022
Benhabib, S. (2006). Las reivindicaciones de la cultura. Igualdad y diversidad en la era global. Buenos Aires: Katz.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2015a). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2015b). Education, Measurement and the Professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Junio, 1-16. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665
Black, P. y Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bolívar, A. (2005). Equidad educativa y teorías de la justicia. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 3(2), 42-69.
Brisolera, S. A. (1998). The history of participatory evaluation and current debates in the field. En E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, Nº 80 (pp. 25-41). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Burke, B. (1998). Evaluating for change: Reflections on a participatory methodology. In E. Whitmore (Ed.) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation (pp. 43-56). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cabrera, F. y Bordas, M. I. (2001). Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes centradas en el proceso. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 59(218), 25-48.
Cousins, J. B. y Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions For Evaluation, 80, 5-23. doi:10.1002/ev.1114
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5-31.
Darling-Hammond, L. y Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5), 523-545. doi: 10.12691/education-3-12B-3
Dochy, F., Segers, M. y Dierick, S. (2002). Nuevas vías de aprendizaje y enseñanza y sus consecuencias: una nueva era de evaluación. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 2(2), 13-29.
Dochy, F., Segers, M. y Sluijmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935
Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R. y Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. Berna: Peter Lang.
Everitt, A. (1996). Developing critical evaluation. Evaluation, 2(2), 173-188.
Everitt, A. y Hardiker, P. (1996). Evaluating for good practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science: liberation and its limits. Cambridge: Polity.
Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of Justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity.
Fraser, N. y Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. Londres: Verso Press.
Freire, P. (1972). Teoría y práctica de la liberación. Madrid: Marsiega.
Freire, P. (1978). La educación como práctica de la libertad. Madrid: Siglo XXI editores.
Freire, P. (1979). Pedagogía del oprimido. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.
Friedrich, D., Jaastad, B. y Popkewitz, T. S. (2010). Democratic education: an (im)possibility that yet remains to come. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5-6). doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00686.x
Frierson, H.T., Hood, S. y Hughes, G. (2002). Strategies that address culturally responsive evaluation. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: a pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport, CO: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Giroux, H. A. (2003). Pedagogía y política de la esperanza. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Goodwin, A. L. (2012). Assessment for equity and inclusion: embracing all our children. Londres: Routledge.
Greene, J.C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. En I. Shaw, J. Greene y M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 118-140). Nueva York: Sage.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B. y Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gulikers, J.T., Bastiaens, T.J. y Kirschner, P.A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67-86. doi:10.1007/BF02504676
Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gutmann, A. y Thompson, D. (2009). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hackman, H. W. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38(2), 103-109. doi:10.1080/10665680590935034
Hargreaves, E. (2007). The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, Principles Policy and Practice, 14(2), 185-199. doi:10.1080/09695940701478594
Hodgen, J. (2007). Formative assessment. Tools for transforming school mathematics towards a dialogic practice. En D. Pitta-Pantazi y G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1886-1895). Larnaca: ERME.
Honneth, A. (1997). La lucha por el reconocimiento: por una gramática moral de los conflictos sociales. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
Honneth, A. (2007). Reificación. Un estudio en la teoría del reconocimiento. Madrid: Katz.
House, E. (1997). Evaluación, ética y poder. Madrid: Morata.
House, E. y Howe, K. (2000a). Deliberative democratic evaluation in practice. Education and Human Services, 49, 409-421. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47559-6_22
House, E. R. y Howe, K. R. (2000b). Deliberative democratic evaluation. En K. E. Ryan y L. DeStefano (Eds.), Evaluation as a democratic process: promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation. (pp. 3-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Irvine, J. y Armento, B. (2001). Culturally responsive teaching: lesson planning for elementary and middle grades. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Jackson, E. T. y Kassam, Y. (1998). Knowledge shared: participatory evaluation in development cooperation. Hartford, CO: IDRC.
Janesick, V. J. (2006). Authentic assessment primer. Berna: Peter Lang.
Janesick, V. J. (2008). Reflexiones sobre la violencia de las pruebas de evaluación estandarizada y la naturaleza tranquilizadora de la pedagogía crítica. En P. Mclaren y J.L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Pedagogía Crítica. De qué hablamos, dónde estamos (pp. 323- 337). Barcelona: Graó.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer. Berna: Peter Lang.
King M., Schroeder, J. y Chawszczewsky, D. (2001). Authentic Assessment and Student Performance in Inclusive Schools. Research Institute on Secondary Education Reform for Youth with Disabilities Brief, 5, 1-15.
King, J. A., Cousins, J. B. y Whitmore, E. (2007). Making sense of participatory evaluation: Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 83-105. doi:10.1002/ev.226
Knight, T. y Pearl, A. (2000). Democratic education and critical pedagogy. The Urban Review, 32(3), 197-226. doi:10.1023/A:1005177227794
Kozleski, E.B. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching matters. Tampe, AZ: Arizona State University
Leach, L., Neutze, G. y Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and empowerment: some critical questions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 293-305. doi:10.1080/02602930120063457
Lejk, M. y Wyvill, M. (2001). Peer assessment of contributions to a group Project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1) 61-72. doi:10.1080/02602930020022291
Lingard, B. y Mills, M. (2007). Pedagogies making a difference: issues of social justice and inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 233-244. doi:10.1080/13603110701237472
Lingard, B., Mills, M. y Hayes, D. (2000). Teachers, school reform and social justice: challenging research and practice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 101-115. doi:10.1007/BF03219733
Lupton, R. (2005). Social justice and school improvement: improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 589–604. doi:10.1080/01411920500240759
McLaren, P. (1997). Critical pedagogy. Teaching Education, 9(1), 1-7.
McLaren, P. (2003). Critical pedagogy: a look at the major concepts. The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 1, 1-23.
McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: an introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Londres: Routledge.
McLaren, P. y Kincheloe, J. L. (2007). Critical pedagogy: where are we now?. Berna: Peter Lang.
Mertens, D. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1-14.
Mertens, D. M. (2003). The inclusive view of evaluation: visions for the new millennium. En S. I. Donaldson y M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: visions for the new millennium (pp. 91–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moreno-Olivos, T. (2004). Evaluación cualitativa del aprendizaje: enfoques y tendencias. Revista de la Educación Superior, 33(3), 93-110.
Moreno-Olivos, T. (2010). Lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo: las muchas caras de la evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 2(1), 84-97.
Mueller, J. (2006). The authentic assessment toolbox. Recuperado de http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/standardtypes.htm
Murillo, F.J. (2004). Equidad en educación. REICE. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 2(1), 1-24.
Murillo, F. J. y Duk, C. (2012). Una evaluación inclusiva para une educación inclusiva. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 6(1), 11-13.
Murillo, F. J. y Hernández-Castilla, R. (2011). Hacia un concepto de justicia social. REICE. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 9(4), 7-23.
Murillo, F. J. y Hernández-Castilla, R. (2014). Liderando escuelas justas para la justicia social. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 3(2), 13-32.
Murillo, F. J. e Hidalgo, N. (2015a). Enfoques fundamentantes de la evaluación de estudiantes para la justicia social. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 8(1), 43-61.
Murillo, F. J. e Hidalgo, N. (2015b). Dime cómo evalúas y te diré qué sociedad construyes. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 8(1), 5-9.
Murillo, F.J. y Román, M. (2008). La evaluación educativa como derecho humano. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 1(1), 1-5.
Nicol, D. J. y Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
North, C.E. (2006). More than words? delving into the substantive meaning(s) of “social justice” in education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 507–535. doi:10.3102/00346543076004507
Pfeiffer, M. L. (2007). En y por una educación con alto sentido social. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/NdsxDF
Popham, W. J. (2011). Transformative assessment in action: An inside look at applying the process. Alexandria, JE: ASCD.
Rawls, J.A. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J.A. (2001). Justice as fairness: a restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rennert-Ariev, P. (2005). A theoretical model for the authentic assessment of teaching. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(2), 151-163. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1002_4
Ruitenberg, C. (2009). Educating political adversaries: Chantal Mouffe and radical democratic citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(3), 269-281. doi:10.1007/s11217-008-9122-2
Ryan, K. E. (2004). Serving public interests in educational accountability: alternative approaches to democratic evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(4), 443–460. doi:10.1177/109821400402500403
Ryan, K., Greene, J., Lincoln, Y., Mathison, S. y Mertens, D. M. (1999). Advantages and challenges of using inclusive evaluation approaches in evaluation practice. The American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 101-122. doi:10.1177/109821409801900111
Sabirón, F. (1999). El discurso y la práctica en evaluación. Propuesta para la deconstrucción y reconstrucción de las prácticas evaluadoras. Zaragoza: ICE- Universidad de Zaragoza.
Sadler, D. R. (2009). Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning. En G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 1-19). Dordrecht: Springer.
Santiuste, V. y Arranz, M. L. (2009). Nuevas perspectivas en el concepto de evaluación. Revista de Educación, 350, 463-476.
Santos Guerra, M. A. (1993). La evaluación: un proceso de diálogo, comprensión y mejora. Investigación en la Escuela, 20, 23-38.
Santos Guerra, M. A. (2003). Una flecha en la diana: La evaluación como aprendizaje. Madrid: Narcea.
Saunders, M. (2006). The ‘presence’ of evaluation theory and practice in educational and social development: Toward an inclusive approach. London Review of Education, 4, 197-215.
Schniedewind, N. y Davidson, E. (2006). Open minds to equality: a sourcebook of learning activities to affirm diversity and promote equity. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-70.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
Sleeter, C. (2013). Teaching for social justice in multicultural classrooms. Multicultural Education Review, 5(2), 1-19. doi:10.14328/MER.2013.09.30.01
Smyth, J. (2012). The socially just school and critical pedagogies in communities put at a disadvantage. Critical Studies in Education, 53(1) 9-18. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.635671
Stern, J. y Backhouse, A. (2011). Dialogic feedback for children and teachers: evaluating the ‘spirit of assessment’. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 16(4), 331-346. doi:10.1080/1364436X.2011.642853
Stowell, M. (2004). Equity, justice and standards: assessment decision making in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), 495-510. doi:10.1080/02602930310001689055
Straume, I. (2015) Democracy, education and the need for politics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(1), 29-45. doi: 10.1007/s11217-015-9465-4
Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433-449. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
Swan, K., Shen, J. y Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 45-62. doi:10.1080/14748460600855526
Taylor, C. (2003). El multiculturalismo y “la política del reconocimiento”. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Thomas, V.G. (2004). Building a contextually responsive evaluation framework: Lessons from working with urban school interventions. En V.G. Thomas y F.I. Stevens (Eds.), Co-constructing a contextually responsive evaluation framework (pp. 3–23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thomas, V. G. y Stevens, F. I. (2004). Coconstructing a contextually responsive evaluation framework. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Torrance, H. (1995). Evaluating authentic assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323-342. doi:10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
Vu, T. T. y Dall’Alba, G. (2014). Authentic assessment for student learning: an ontological conceptualisation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(7), 778-791. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.795110
Waters, G. A. (1998). Critical evaluation for education reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6, 20. doi:10.14507/epaa.v6n20.1998
Wehlburg, C. (2008). Promoting integrated and transformative assessment: a deeper focus on student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Whitmore, E. (ed.). (1998). Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703–713. doi:10.1177/003172171109200721
William, D. (2007). Assessment for learning: why, what and how. Londres: Institute of Education.
Wink, J. (2005). Critical pedagogy: notes from the real world. Boston: Pearson.
Young, I. M. (2000). La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
Young, I. M. (2011). Responsabilidad por la justicia. Madrid: Paidós.
Zajda, J., Majhanovich, S. y Rust, V. (2006). Education and social justice. Dordrecht: Springer.