Vol. 35 (2020): Possible futures for schools and education
Monograph: Possible futures for schools and education

Market and Multi-regulation of Educational Systems: Case Studies on the Trajectory of Schools in Chile 2000-2010

Juan Antonio Carrasco Bahamonde
Investigador Independiente
Bio
Daniel Carrasco Bahamonde
Investigador Independiente
Front cover of Tendencias Pedagógicas, volume 35
Published December 20, 2019

Keywords:

multi-regulation, educational market, quality of education, equity
How to Cite
Carrasco Bahamonde, J. A., & Carrasco Bahamonde, D. (2019). Market and Multi-regulation of Educational Systems: Case Studies on the Trajectory of Schools in Chile 2000-2010. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 35, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2020.35.006

Abstract

Contemporary educational policies that encourage competition between schools subscribe to economic arguments about the superior nature of markets and are articulated based on a virtuous vision of their effects. The following report aims to explore the connections between market dynamics in education, especially the expansion of competition between schools through privatisation identifying the responses that schools elaborate to a competitive environment. Thus, our objective is to understand how market dynamics are related to the trajectories of schools during the period 2000-2010 in Chile. To respond to this objective, we used a research design based on a multiple case study and through different sources of information we examined the trajectory of public and private schools located in highly competitive contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auguste y Valenzuela, J. (2004) “Do students benefit from school competition? Evidence from Chile”. University of Michigan.

Ball, S., & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatization in public education. Londres: University of London.

Bauman, Z. (2013). Sobre la educación en un mundo líquido. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Bellei, C., & Vanni, X. (2015). The evolution of educational policy in Chile: 1980-2014. In Schwartzman, S. (Ed.). Education in South America. New York: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474243223.ch-008

Bellei, C., & Orellana, V. (2014). What does “Education Privatization” mean? Conceptual discussion and empirical review from Latin American cases. Documento de Trabajo Núm. 14 CIAE – Universidad de Chile.

Bellei, C., Contreras, D., & Valenzuela, J. (2010). Ecos de la revolución pingüina. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile / UNICEF.

Bellei, C, Valenzuela, J, Vanni X., y Contreras, D. (2014) «Lo Aprendí en la Escuela ¿Cómo se logran procesos de mejoramiento escolar? Universidad de Chile y UNICEF.

Bellei, C. (2007). Expansión de la educación privada y mejoramiento de la educación en Chile. Evaluación a partir de la Evidencia. Revista Pensamiento Educativo, 40(1), pp. 285-311.

Bellei, C., De Los Ríos, D., & Valenzuela, J. (2008). Evolución de la segregación socioeconómica de los estu-diantes chilenos y su relación con el financiamiento compartido. Santiago: FONIDE/MINEDUC.

Carnoy, M. (1998). National voucher plans in Chile and Sweden: Did privatization reforms make for better education? Comparative Education Review, 42(3), pp. 309-337. doi: doi.org/10.1086/447510.

Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1998). Politics, markets and the organization of school. American Political Science Review, 82(4), pp. 1065-1087. doi: doi.org/10.2307/1961750.

Cox, C. (2012). Política y Políticas educacionales en Chile 1990-2010. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 21(1), pp. 13-42.

Donoso, S. (2012) «Auge y Caída del Movimiento Pingüino el Año 2006». Documento Núm. 14. Departamento de Gobierno Universidad del Desarrollo.

Dupriez, V., y Maroy, C. (2003) Regulation in school systems: A theoretical analysis of the struc-tural framework of the school system in French-speaking Belgium. Journal of Education Policy, 18(4), pp. 375–92. doi: doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000106839.

Eisenhardt, K. (1998) Building Theories from Case Study Research. University of Stanford.

Friedman, M. (1955). The Role of government in education. In Solo, R (ed.), Economics and the Public interest. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University.

Lundstrom, U., & Parding, K. (2011). Teacher’s experience with school choice: clashing logics in the Sweden educational system. Education. Research International, II. doi: doi.org/10.1155/2011/869852.

Maroy, C. (2004). Changes in regulation modes and social production of inequalities in education systems: a Euro-pean comparison. Brussels: European Commission.

Tokman, A. (2002). Is private education better? Evidence from Chile. Documento de Trabajo Núm. 147, Central Bank of Chile.

Van Zanten, A. (2005). New modes of reproducing social inequality in education: the changing roles of parents, teachers, schools and educational policies. European Educational Research Journal, 4(3). doi: doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.1.

Verger, A., Bonal, X., & Zancajo, A., (2014). ¿What role and impact do public-private partner-ships have in education? A realist evaluation of the Chilean education quasimarket. Artículo presentado en la Conferencia CIES, Toronto.