School Leadership Retention: Designing a Bioecological Model for Leadership Retention
Keywords:
Education, educational opportunities, Principals Professional Training, Leadership, Educational policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Previous research has highlighted the fundamental contribution of leadership in school improvement. Principals are key in mobilizing school transformation processes, fostering teacher capacities and motivations, and setting optimal organizational conditions to support teaching and learning. Previous studies have pointed out the importance of principal retention for the success of school improvement processes. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the area of talent management by proposing a model that could help explain and reduce principal attrition. Using the integrative literature review strategy, we have explored the last two decades (2001-2021) of publications on management retention. A total of 28 articles were analysed in depth, identifying 23 central variables that could explain the management decision to stay or withdraw from school. We organize these variables in a bioecological model, including individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and political dimensions. The results are an invitation to public policymakers, educational administrators and educational leaders to generate strategies to strengthen the retention of principals and directors. We conclude by presenting limitations and directions for future research.
Downloads
References
Baker, B. D., Punswick, E. y Belt, C. (2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 523-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10383832
Bartanen, B., Rogers, L. K. y Woo, D. S. (2021). Assistant principal mobility and its relationship with principal turnover. Educational Researcher, 50(6), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X21993105
Beckett, L. O. (2021). Predictors of urban principal turnover. Urban Education, 56(10), 1695-1718. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208591877262
Belliba?, M. ?., Gümü?, S. y Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
Béteille, T., Kalogrides, D. y Loeb, S. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41(4), 904-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.003
Bolívar, A., Muñoz, G., Weinstein, J. y Domingo, J. (Coords.). (2022). Liderazgo educativo en tiempos de crisis: Aprendizajes para la escuela post-Covid. Universidad de Granada.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
Coleman, M. y Campbell-Stephens, R. (2010). Perceptions of career progress: The experience of black and minority ethnic school leaders. School Leadership & Management, 30(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430903509741
Davis, B. y Anderson, E. (2021). Visualizing differential principal turnover. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2020-0054
DeAngelis, K. J. y White, B. R. (2011). Principal turnover in illinois public schools, 2001-2008. Illinois Education Research Council Bringing Research to Policy and Practice.
DeMatthews, D. E., Knight, D. S. y Shin, J. (2022). The principal-teacher churn: Understanding the relationship between leadership turnover and teacher attrition. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(1), 76-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211051974
Dixon, L. L., Pham, L. D., Henry, G. T., Corcoran, S. P. y Zimmer, R. (2022). Who leads turnaround schools? characteristics of principals in Tennessee’s achievement school district and innovation zones. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(2), 258-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211055702
El Zaatari, W. y Maalouf, I. (2022). How the Bronfenbrenner bio-ecological system theory explains the development of students’ sense of belonging to school? SAGE Open, 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221134089
Edge, K., Descours, K. y Oxley, L. (2017). Generation X leaders from London, New York and Toronto: Conceptions of social identity and the influence of city-based context. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 863-883. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717278
Fuller, E. y Hollingworth, L. (2018). Questioning the use of outcome measures to evaluate principal preparation programs. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1270332
Fuller, E. J., Hollingworth, L. y An, B. P. (2016). The impact of personal and program characteristics on the placement of school leadership preparation program graduates in school leader positions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 643-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16656039
Fuller, E. J. y Young, M. D. (2022). Challenges and opportunities in diversifying the leadership pipeline: flow, leaks and interventions. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2021.2022712
Gajda, R. y Militello, M. (2008). Recruiting and retaining school principals: What we can learn from practicing administrators. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 5(2), 14-20.
Glazzard, J. y Stones, S. (2021). ‘Nothing fazes me, I can do it all’: Developing headteacher resilience in a complex and challenging educational climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1829712
Grissom, J. A., Mitani, H. y Woo, D. S. (2019). Principal preparation programs and principal outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 73-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785865
Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965-2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772
Hansen, C. (2018). Why rural principals leave. The Rural Educator, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v39i1.214
Hargreaves, A. (2020). Large-scale assessments and their effects: The case of mid-stakes tests in Ontario. Journal of Educational Change, 21, 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09380-5
Holmes, W. T., Parker, M., Olsen, J. J. y Khojasteh, J. (2021). The effect of rural superintendent credibility on principal and district outcomes mediated by motivating language. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(6), 776-793. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2021-0038
Hopkins, D. y Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071461
Husain, A. N., Miller, L. C. y Player, D. W. (2021). Principal turnover: Using teacher-assessments of principal quality to understand who leaves the principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 683-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211011235
Johnson, L. (2021). Portraits of UK black and south asian headteachers five years on: Leadership retention in the age of academization. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(4), 662-684. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211009896
Kyriakides, L., Antoniou, P. y Dimosthenous, A. (2021). Does the duration of school interventions matter? The effectiveness and sustainability of using the dynamic approach to promote quality and equity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 607-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. y Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. Sage.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A. y Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Martinez, M. A., Rivera, M. y Marquez, J. (2020). Learning from the experiences and development of Latina school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(3), 472-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19866491
Mascall, B. y Leithwood, K. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(4), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2010.493633
Miller, P. y Callender, C. (2018). Black leaders matter: Agency, progression and the sustainability of BME school leadership in England. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-12-2016-0063
Mitani, H. (2018). Principals’ working conditions, job stress, and turnover behaviors under NCLB accountability pressure. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(5), 822-862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785874
Montecinos, C., Ahumada, L., Galdames, S., Campos, F. y Leiva, M. V. (2015). Targets, threats and (dis)trust: The managerial troika for public school principals in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 87. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2083
Montecinos, C., Galdames, S., Flessa, J. y Valenzuela, J. P. (2022). Pathways to the school principalship: An international scoping review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211065341
Oplatka, I. y Ben Or, H. (2020). The arrival of a new principal and the school staff: The former principal and the first weeks in post. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(3), 492-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2019-0169
Papa, F. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760701263725
Pendola, A. y Fuller, E. J. (2022). Homeward bound? Rural Principal hiring, transfer, and turnover patterns in Texas: Homeward bound? Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(1), 43-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211045920
Pietsch, M., Tulowitzki, P. y Hartig, J. (2020). Examining the effect of principal turnover on teaching quality: A study on organizational change with repeated classroom observations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1672759
Reames, E. H., Kochan, F. K y Zhu, L. (2014). Factors influencing principals’ retirement decisions: A southern US perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499254
Romero, C. (2020). Liderazgo directivo en escuelas que superan las barreras del contexto. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.1.005
Shah, S. (2023). Navigating gender stereotypes as educational leaders: An ecological approach. Management in Education, 37(3), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206211021845
Shore, K. y Walshaw, M. (2018). Assistant/deputy principals: What are their perceptions of their role? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 310-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1218550
Simon, S., Dole, S. y Farragher, Y. (2019). Custom-designed and safe-space coaching: Australian beginning principals supported by experienced peers form pipeline of confident future leaders. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1470502
Snodgrass Rangel, V. (2018). A review of the literature on principal turnover. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 87-124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743197
Swen, C. P. (2020). Talk of calling: Novice school principals narrating destiny, duty, and fulfillment in work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 177-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19840387
Tekleselassie, A. A. y Choi, J. (2021). Understanding school principal attrition and mobility through hierarchical generalized linear modeling. Educational Policy, 35(7), 1116-1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/089590481985782
Tekleselassie, A. A. y Villarreal, P. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2011.585536
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Torres, A. C. (2020). Push, pull, tap and switch: Understanding the career decisions of charter school leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1513155
Towers, E. (2022). Why do headteachers stay in disadvantaged primary schools in London? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(2), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1759651
Tran, H. y Buckman, D. G. (2017). The impact of principal movement and school achievement on principal salaries. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(1), 106-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1197279
Urick, A. (2016). The influence of typologies of school leaders on teacher retention: A multilevel latent class analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 434-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2014-0090
van Velzen, W. G. (1985). Making school improvement work: A conceptual guide to practice. Acco.
Wang, F., Pollock, K. y Hauseman, C. (2021). Complexity and volume: Work intensification of vice-principals in Ontario. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1974097
Yan, R. (2020). The influence of working conditions on principal turnover in K-12 public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 89-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X1984039