Vol. 9 No. 2 (2011): Ethics in Educational Research
Articles

Challenges of the Research and the Practice of Embodied: A Point of View from the Feldenkrais® Method of Somatic Education

Published June 26, 2016

Keywords:

Somatic education, qualitative research, body awareness, awareness through movement
How to Cite
Eisenberg Wieder, R., & Joly, Y. (2016). Challenges of the Research and the Practice of Embodied: A Point of View from the Feldenkrais® Method of Somatic Education. REICE. Ibero-American Journal on Quality, Effectiveness and Change in Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2011.9.2.010

Abstract

Somatic education is a new disciplinary field that focuses on the living body; consciousness exercised by the biological body and in the movement of the embodiment within the internal and external space. The Feldenkrais method (FM) and all the approaches of somatic education, have their own qualitative research needs to be reformulated, to identify their theoretical and scientific base, to measure the effects of their practices and to understand and improve the processes of training of practitioners and teachers. We must demonstrate the same paradox of a verbal inquiry into the non-verbal body and, if one wishes to do qualitative research of quality, the investigator must submit himself to the experience of awareness of its corporeality, – some proposals in this article if the reader ventures to perform them - therefore the somatic education proposes a particular form of qualitative research. Most of the points of view presented here, arise from the experience of Yvan Joly practitioner, trainer and researcher in education somatic and especially, as professor of the Feldenkrais Method associated with the "awareness of the body by the movement”. The integration of the ideas were carried out by Rose Eisenberg Wieder, ex-alumnae of Yvan Joly, current teacher and researcher education in the fields of training values for health and environment and teacher of the Feldenkrais method.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beaudoin, C. (1994). L'expérience d'intégration des apprentissages en éducation somatique selon une perspective phénoménologique. Mimeo. Québec: Universidad Laval.

Eisenberg, R., Chávez, C., Cuevas, V., Gutiérrez, J., Rosas, S. y Landázuri, A.M. (2005). La recuperación psicocorporal del académico como eje básico para la formación valoral ambiental.IFF, Academy Feldenkrais Research Journal, 2. http://feldenkrais-method.org/he/node/1890.

Eisenberg R., (2004). El Método Feldenkrais® (MF) como estrategia para mejorar el aprendizaje de sí mismo, a través de la conciencia por el movimiento. Revista Educación 2001, 113.

Eisenberg R. (coord.)(2007).Corporeidad, Movimiento y Educación física 1992-2004. Estudios cuali-cuantitativos, 1, pp. 560.

Eisenberg, R., Jiménez M.L., Gutiérrez J.I. (2009). La precariedad de la investigación educativa en Corporeidad, Movimiento y Educación Física: publicaciones y algunas opiniones al interior del COMIE Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Filosofía de la Educación, pp. 43-54. Madrid, 19-21 de junio de 2008, 2009.

Fortin, S. (1995). Toward a new generation: Somatic dance education in academia. Impulse: The International Journal for Dance Science, Medicine, and Education, 3, 253-262.

Fortin, S. (1994). La investigación cualitativa en el estudio de la danza: una relación dialógica cuerpo a cuerpo. Association Pour La Recherche Qualitative, 12, pp. 75-86.

Fortin, S. (1993). When dance science and somatics enter the dance technique class. Kinesiology and Medicine for Dance,15(2), 88-107.

Guimond, O. (1987). L'acteur et le corps apparent. Département d'études françaises, tesis doctoral. Montreal: Universidad de Montreal.

Grasso, A.E. (2010). Construyendo identidad corporal: La corporeidad escuchada. Revista de Psicomotricidad Editorial. Novedades Educativas.

Hanna, T. (1989). La somática. México: Yug.

Joly, Y., y Eisenberg, R. (2008). Educación Somática: Reflexiones sobre la práctica de la conciencia del cuerpo en movimiento. México: UNAM, DGNAM, ESEF, Plaza y Valdés, AMMEF.

Joly, Y. (1994). L'éducation somatique: au delà du discours des méthodes. Boletín de bienvenida. Asociación francesa de practicantes del método Feldenkrais.

Korzybski, A. (1966). Le rôle du langage dans les processus perceptuels. Nueva York: The International Non-aristotelian Library.

Maturana, H. y Verla, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library.

Poerksen, B. (2004). The certainly of uncertainly: Dialogues introducing constructivism. Imprint academic. Amazon.

Regroupement québécois pour l' éducation somatique, (1994). Brochure de présentation du regroupement et des approches représentées. Quebec: RES.

Rosenfield, I. (1992). The strange, the familiar and the forgotten: An anatomy of consciousness. Nueva York: Alfred K. Knopf.

Rosenfield, I. (1993). Pourquoi le cerveau n'est pas un ordinateur, Science et vie, 184.

St Arnaud, Y. (1993). Guide méthodologique pour conceptualiser un modèle d'intervention, Serre (éd.) Recherche, formation et pratiques en éducation des adultes. chap. 8. Sherbrooke: Editions du crp, Université de Sherbrooke.

St Arnaud Y. y Joly, Y. (l992). Agir consciemment: conceptualisation du modèle d'une pratique en éducation somatique. Mimeografiado del Departamento de psicología. Sherbrooke: Universidad de Sherbrooke.

Varela, F., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1993). L'inscription corporelle de l'esprit: sciences cognitives et expérience humaine. París: Seuil.

Varela, F. (1993 a). Rencontre avec Francisco Varela, Sciences humaines, 31.

Varela, F. (1993 b), Varela chauffe la tête. Actuel, 31-32.