Palabras clave:
Retroalimentación, Desarrollo profesional, Speech therapy, Conversación dialógica, Calidad educativa
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Resumen
Este estudio analiza el feedback compartido entre docentes, durante prácticas de observación recíproca, con el propósito de identificar las características que determinan la calidad del diálogo entre ellos y cómo este puede contribuir a la mejora de su práctica profesional. Participaron 400 docentes, de los cuales se seleccionaron 217 archivos de audio. Los objetivos específicos del estudio son: 1) Caracterizar las sesiones de retroacción y 2) Identificar las variables que predicen la elaboración de un feedback de calidad. Los resultados muestran que la mayoría de las parejas docentes intercambian retroalimentación dialógica de calidad, siendo esta moderada por el grado de interacción y la prevalencia de acciones verbales que favorecen la construcción de conocimiento. Se recomienda fomentar prácticas como la elaboración de propuestas, la negociación y la reflexión sobre la práctica para facilitar una retroacción más proactiva, vinculada a un plan de acción que mejore la colaboración y el desarrollo profesional docente.
Descargas
Citas
Alam, J. y Aamir, S. M. (2020). Continuous professional development of secondary school teachers through peer observation: Implications for policy and practice. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 1(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss1-2020(56-75)
Charteris, J. y Smardon, D. (2014). Dialogic peer coaching as teacher leadership for professional inquiry. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2013-0022
Charteris, J. y Smardon, D. (2016). Professional learning as “diffractive” practice: Rhizomatic peer coaching. Reflective Practice, 17(5), 544-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1184632
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Corcelles, M., Duran, D., Flores, M., Miquel, E., y Ribosa, J. (2023). Percepciones docentes sobre observación entre iguales: resistencias, agencia, procedimiento y objetivos de mejora. Estudios sobre Educación, 44, 35-58. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.44.002
Cravens, X.C., y Hunter, S.B. (2021). Assessing the impact of collaborative inquiry on teacher performance and effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 564-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923532
De Jong, K., Conijn, J. M., Gallagher, R. A., Reshetnikova, A. S., Heij, M., y Lutz, M. C. (2021). Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102002
De la Iglesia Mayol, B., y Rosselló Ramon, M. R. (2018). Aplicación del sistema Internacional de observación y feedback docente (ISTOF-II) en un contexto educativo no anglosajón. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 16(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2018.16.1.006
Duran. D., Flores, M., Mas, O., y Sanahuja, J. M. (2019). Docencia compartida en la formación inicial del profesorado: potencialidades y dificultades según los estudiantes y los profesores. REIRE. Revista d'Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 12(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2019.12.227430
Duran, D., Miquel, E., y Corcelles, M. (2020). La observación entre iguales como mecanismo de desarrollo profesional docente: La percepción de los participantes de la xarxa de competències bàsiques. Àmbits de Psicopedagogia i Orientació, 53, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.32093/ambits.vi53.2636
Fletcher, J. A. (2018). Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19455.82084
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., y Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043358
Huguet, T., y Lázaro, L. (2018). Iniciar y mantener prácticas de docencia compartida en las aulas. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 275, 39-44.
Jao, L. (2013). Peer coaching as a model for professional development in the elementary mathematics context: Challenges, needs and rewards. Policy Futures in Education, 11(3), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.290
Kinicki, A., y Kreitner, R. (2006). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills y best practices. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Kunemund, R. L., Kennedy, M. J., Carlisle, L. M., VanUitert, V. J., y McDonald, S. D. (2022). A Multimedia option for delivering feedback and professional development to teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211004121
Landis, J. R., y Koch, G. G. (1977). A one-way components of variance model for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 671-679. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529465
Lefstein, A., Vedder-Weiss, D., y Segal, A. (2020). Relocating research on teacher learning: Toward pedagogically productive talk. Educational Researcher, 49(5), 360-368. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20922998
Lefstein A., y Snell J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. Routledge.
Murphy, R., Weinhardt, F., y Wyness, G. (2021). Who teaches the teachers? A RCT of peer-to-peer observation and feedback in 181 schools. Economics of Education Review, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102091
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing.
O’Leary, M. (2020). Classroom Observation. A guide to effective observation of teaching and learning. Routledge.
O’Leary, M., y Savage, S. (2020). Breathing new life into the observation of teaching and learning in higher education: Moving from the performative to the informative. Professional Development in Education, 46(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1633386
Onrubia, J., Plaza-Iniesta, R., y Sánchez-Fuentes, A. J. (2022). Una síntesis cuantitativa del cumplimiento de la Agenda 2030 en la Unión Europea. ICEI.
Parr, J. M., y Hawe, E. (2017). Facilitating real-time observation of, and peer discussion and feedback about, practice in writing classrooms. Professional Development in Education, 43(5), 709-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.124181
Popp, J. S., y Goldman, S. R. (2016). Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.007
Popp, J. S. (2021). Evolving problems of practice: How a teacher’s reflective courses of action contributed to her learning and change. Action in Teacher Education, 43(4), 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1883152
Rosselló Ramon, M. R., y De la Iglesia Mayol, B. (2021). Peer feedback and its impact on professional teaching development. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32(3), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.70173
Scardamalia, M., y Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge Building Environments: Extending the Limits of the Possible in Education and Knowledge work. En A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, y R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp 269-272). Sage Publication.
Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., y Stijnen, S. (2012). Investigating feedback on practice among teachers: Coherence of observed and perceived feedback. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(4), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.725981
Torres, A. C., Lopes, A., Valente, J. M. S., y Mouraz, A. (2017). What catches the eye in class observation? Observers’ perspectives in a multidisciplinary peer observation of teaching program. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(7), 822-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1301907
Van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W. J. C. M., van Veen, K., y Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. (2016). Once is not enough: Establishing reliability criteria for feedback and evaluation decisions based on classroom observations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.001
Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., y Van Halem, N. (2017). Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.014
Windsor, S., Maxwell, G., y Antonsen, Y. (2022). Incorporating sustainable development and inclusive education in teacher education for the Arctic. Polar Geography, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2022.2105970
Wylie, E. C., y Lyon, C. J. (2020). Developing a formative assessment protocol to support professional growth. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 314-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956
Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M. J., y Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.015