Gender relations, power dynamics and silences in Spanish scientific institutions and universities
Keywords:
scientific research, Academia, gender gap, discriminationAbstract
The incorporation of women into the scientific and academic field has improved in recent decades, not without reluctance and with a gender gap that persists at all levels. Some of the discriminations that women have to face are: more time spent on care work inside and outside the workplace, stereotypes and lack of scientific recognition, motherhood as an unrecognized obstacle and therefore a turning point in their careers; and the lack of benchmark women, especially in some areas. Studies that have analyzed the gender gap in the scientific and academic fields in recent decades have typically been doing by statistical data. Without discounting their findings, we consider important to complement them with qualitative studies such as the one we present. Through fieldwork consisting in-depth semi-structured interviews with women working in Spanish research centers and universities, we will analyse the current state of the gender gap in their work environments. The results show that, despite the fact that there are currently certain mechanisms to combat these gender discriminations, some more obvious forms of sexism and others much more subtle and invisible remain. Likewise, some female scientists and academics perceive that they are the ones who do all the work for the academic family, due to the dichotomy of male transparency/hypervisibility versus female opacity/clandestinity that describes women's work in the academic and scientific context. The consequence is a clear employment advantage for men: positions with better pay and social recognition, mainly because they have more time available, both to continue be promoted in their career and to dedicate it to whatever outside of work. We will end this paper with some reflections on the discomfort of female scientists, which go beyond the gender gap and sometimes many of them suggest that the problem lies in the system that supports the scientific and academic world, but also in the current labor market.
Downloads
References
Abramo, Giovanni; D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea y Di Costa, Flavia. 2013. Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7:811-822.
Agudo, Yolanda. 2006. El lado oscuro de la mujer en la investigación científica: ¿es la ciencia una ‘empresa’ masculina? Cuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia, 1:15-51.
Andersen, Jens Peter; Nielsen, Mathias W.; Simone, Nicole L.; Lewiss, Resa E. y Jagsi, Reshma. 2020. Meta-Research: COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected. eLife 9:e58807. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58807
Araújo, Tanya y Fontainha, Elsa, 2017. The specific shapes of gender imbalance in scientific authorships: A network approach. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1):88-102.
Azpeitia, María Concepción. 2003. Género e identidad profesional en los trabajadores sociales. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 16: 147-170.
Barral, María José; Delgado, Isabel; Fernández, Teresa y Magallón, Carmen. 2014. Life Paths of Successful Women Scientists in Spain. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 3(1):351-372. https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2014.33.
Bleidorn, Wiebke; Arslan, Ruben C.; Denissen, Jaap J.A.; Rentfrow, Peter J.; Gebauer, Jochen E.; Potter, Jeff y Gosling, Samuel D. 2016. Age and gender differences in self-esteem-A cross-cultural window. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(3):396-410. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000078.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999. Razones practicas. Sobre la teoría de la acción. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Bozeman, Barry y Corley, Elizabeth. 2004. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4):599-616. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
Bozeman, Barry y Gaughan, Monica. 2011. How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10):1393-1402.
Clace, Pauline Rose y Imes, Suzanne. 1978. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3): 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006
Comisión Europea, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2013. She Figures 2012. Gender in Research and Innovation: Statistics and Indicators. Bruselas: Publications Office.
Cruz-Castro, Laura. 2021. Diferencias y sesgos de género en la financiación de la investigación: un enfoque dinámico. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, (26):6–19. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.i26.10909
Cui, Ruomeng; Ding, Hao y Zhu, Feng. 2020. Gender Inequality in Research Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623492
Dahlberg Maria Lund y Higginbotham, Eve (eds.). 2021. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Careers of Women in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
De Montarlot, Anne y Cadoche, Élisabeth. 2021. El síndrome de la impostora: ¿Por qué las mujeres carecen de tanta confianza en sí mismas? Barcelona: Península
Durán, María Ángeles. 2000. Si Aristóteles levantara la cabeza: Quince ensayos sobre las ciencias y las letras. Madrid: Cátedra.
Elsevier. 2017. Report 2017: Gender in the Global Research Landscape. Consultado el 28/11/2024. www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1083945/Elsevier-gender-report-2017.pdf
Elsevier. 2020. Gender report 2020: The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens. Consultado el 13/10/2024. www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1083971/Elsevier-gender-report-2020.pdf
Fell, Clemens B. y König, Cornelius J. 2016. Is there a gender diference in scientifc collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial-organizational psychologists. Scientometrics, 108(1):113-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1967-5
Fox, Mary Frank. 2010. Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(7):997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356234
Galceran, Montserrat. 2013. Entre la academia y el mercado. Las Universidades en el contexto del capitalismo basado en el conocimiento. Athenea Digital, 13(1):155-167.
García, María Luisa; Arranz, Fátima; Del Val, Consuelo; Agudo, Yolanda; Viedma, Antonio; Justo, Cristina y Pardo, Pilar. 2006. Mujeres y hombres en la ciencia española. Una investigación empírica. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.
Ghiasi, Gita; Larivière, Vincent y Sugimoto, Cassidy R. 2015. On the compliance of women engineers with a gendered scientific system. PloS ONE, 10(12): e0145931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145931
Glick Peter y Fiske, Susan T. 1996. The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3):491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
González, Lydia. 2015. Las mujeres en los premios científicos en España 2009-2014. Madrid: Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.
Gonza?lez, Marta y Pérez, Eulalia. 2002. Ciencia, Tecnología y Género. CTS+I: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, 2(5). http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9488.
Guarino, Cassandra y Borden, Victor. 2017. Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family? Research in Higher Education, 58, 672-694. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2.
Guatimosim, Cristina. 2020. Reflections on motherhood and the impact of COVID 19 pandemic on women's scientific careers. Journal of neurochemistry, 155(5): 469-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15158
Harding, Sandra. 1996. Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Morata.
Holman, Luke; Morandin, Claire. 2019. Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences. PLoS ONE, 14(4): e0216128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216128
Holman, Luke; Stuart-Fox, Devi y Hauser, Cindy E. 2018. The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4): e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
Hopkins Allison L.; Jawitz, James W.; McCarty, Christopher; Goldman, Alex y Basu, Nandita B. 2013. Disparities in Publication Patterns by Gender, Race and Ethnicity Based on a Survey of a Random Sample of Authors. Scientometrics, 96(2):515-534. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0893-4
Hosek, Susan D.; Cox, Amy G.; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie; Kofner, Aaron; Ramphal, Nishal; Scott, Jon y Berry, Sandra H.2005. Gender differences in Major Federal External Grant Programs. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation. Consultado el 17/11/2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR307.html.
Huyer, Sophia. 2016. Is the gender gap narrowing in science and engineering? En UNESCO science report: towards 2030, 85-103. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406
Ibáñez, Marta; García Mingo, Elisa y Aguado, Empar. 2022. Mujeres en mundos de hombres: segregación ocupacional de género y mecanismos de cierre social de acceso en profesiones de dominación masculina. Sociología del Trabajo, 101:329-343. https://doi.org/10.5209/stra.81673
Jadidi, Mohsen; Karimi, Fariba; Lietz, Haiko y Wagner, Claudia. 2018. Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists. Advances in Complex Systems, 21(3-4).
Jagsi, Reshma; Griffith, Kent A.; Jones, Rochelle; Perumalswami, Chithra R.; Ubel, Peter y Stewart, Abigail. 2016. Sexual harassment and discrimination experiences of Academic Medical Faculty. JAMA, 315(19):2120-2121. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2188
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia; Glynn, Carroll J. y Huge, Michael. 2013. The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest. Science Communication, 35(5): 603-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684
Kyvik, Svein y Teigen, Mari. 1996. Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(1):54-71.
Lara, Catalina. 2007. La perspectiva de género en los sistemas de evaluación de la producción científica. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 25(1):133-148. https://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/96611
Larivière, Vincent; Ni, Chaoqun; Gingras, Yves; Cronin, Blaise y Sugimoto, Cassidy R. 2013. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504:211-213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a
Larivière, Vincent; Vignola-Gagné, Etienne; Villeneuve, Christian; Gélinas, Pascal y Gingras, Yves. 2011. Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Quebec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3):483-498.
Lerchenmueller, Marc J.; Sorenson, Olav y Jena, Anupam B. 2019. Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. British Medical Journal, 367, l6573. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6573.
Lewison, Grant. 2001. The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1):29-43. doi:10.1023/A:1012794810883.
Leydesdorff, Loet y Wagner, Caroline S. 2008. International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4):317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003.
Long, J. Scott. 1990. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68:1297-1316.
Long, J. Scott; Allison, Paul D. y McGinnis, Robert. 1993. Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58(5):703-722.
Lo?pez, Ana J. y Pereira, Dolores. 2021. Transfer of knowledge: is it a gender matter? Ciencia, Te?cnica y Mainstreaming Social, (5):16-30. https://doi.org/10.4995/citecma.2021.14261
Lo?pez, Ana J.; Pereira, Dolores.; Dema, Sandra y Di?az, Capitolina. 2020. Informe encuesta AMIT sobre el sexenio de transferencia: resultados preliminares. Revista Igualdad, 14:56-64.
Martin, Jennifer L. 2014. Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(11): e1003903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003903
Mayer, Sabrina J. y Rathmann, Justus M.K. 2018. How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117(3):1663-1693. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1.
McDowell John M. y Smith, Janet K. 1992. The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: Implications for academic promotion. Economic Inquiry, 30(1):68-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1992.tb01536.x
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades - Unidad Mujeres y Ciencia. 2025. Informe "Científicas en Cifras". https://www.ciencia.gob.es/InfoGeneralPortal/documento/a7f58f07-de09-4410-9ff8-959483ac49cc
Moss-Racusin, Corinne A.; Dovidio, John F.; Brescoll, Victoria L.; Graham, Mark J. y Handelsman, Jo. 2012. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109: 16474-16479.
National Science Foundation, NSF. 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012 (NSB 12-01). Arlington, National Science Foundation.
O'Dorchai, Sile; Meulders, Danièle; Crippa, Francesca y Margherita, Antonia. 2009. She figures 2009. Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/10329
OEI, Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos. 2018. Papeles del Observatorio Nº 9: Las brechas de género en la producción científica Iberoamericana. Buenos Aires, Observatorio Iberoamericano de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Sociedad de la Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos (OCTS-OEI).
Pinho-Gomes Ana-Catarina; Peters, Sanne; Thompson, Kelly; Hockham, Carinna; Ripullone, Katherine; Woodward, Mark y Carcel, Cheryl. 2020. Where are the women? Gender inequalities in COVID-19 research authorship. British Medical Journal-Global Health, 5(7): e002922. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002922.
Pohlhaus Jennifer R.; Jiang, Hong; Wagner, Robin M; Schaffer, Walter T. y Pinn, Vivian W. 2011. Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs. Academic medicine, 86(6):759-767. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821836ff
Reskin, Barbara F. 1978. Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology, 83(5):1235-1243. https://doi.org/10.1086/226681.
Reuben, Ernesto; Sapienza, Paola y Zingales, Luigi. 2014. How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(12), 4403-4408. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314788111.
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993. The Matthew Matilda effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2):325-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004
Segarra-Saavedra, Jesús; Tur-Vin?es, Victoria y Hidalgo-Mari?, Tatiana. 2020. Género y perfil en las autorías y colaboraciones de Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación (2010-2019). Index.Comunicacio?n, 10(1):149-172. https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/10/01Genero
Shaw, Allison K. y Stanton, Daniel E. 2012. Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 279(1743):3736-3741. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0822.
Slaughter, Sheila y Leslie, Larry L. 1997. Academic Capitalism, Politics, Policies and the entrepreneurial University. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Squazzoni, Flaminio; Bravo, Giangiacomo; Grimaldo, Francisco; García-Costa, Daniel; Farjam, Mike y Mehmani, Bahar. 2021. Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. PLoS ONE, 16(10): e0257919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257919.
SRUK/CERU-Society of Spanish Researchers in the United Kingdom. 2018. Percepciones que crean barreras. Igualdad de género en la investigación científica. Fundación COTEC para la Innovación. Madrid: Sociedad de Cienti?ficos Espan?oles en Reino Unido - CERU.
Teele, Dawn L. y Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2):433-447. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002985.
Tomàs, Marina y Mentado, Trinidad. 2013. Las temáticas y preocupaciones de las investigadoras élite en Ciencias Sociales de las universidades catalanas. Arbor, 189(760):a019. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2013.760n2005
Trower, Cathy A., y Chait, Richard P. 2002. Faculty Diversity: Why women and minorities are underrepresented in the professoriate, and fresh ideas to induce needed reform. Harvard magazine, 104(4):33-37.
Uhly, Katrina M.; Visser, Laura M. y Zippel, Kathrin S. 2017. Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4):760-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1072151
Umbach, Paul D. 2007. Gender equity in the academic labor market: An analysis of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 48:169-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9043-2.
Unidad de Mujeres y Ciencia, UMYC. 2011. Libro Blanco. Situación de las mujeres en la Ciencia Española. Madrid: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.
Viglione, Giuliana. 2020. Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here's what the data say. Nature, 581(7809):365-366. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01294-9.
Webster, Berenika M. 2001. Polish women in science: A bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications. Research Evaluation, 10(3):185-194. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154401781776999.
West, Jevin D.; Jacquet, Jennifer; King, Molly M.; Correll, Shelley J.; Bergstrom, Carl T. 2013. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS One, 8(7):e66212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.
Wright, Anne L.; Schwindt, Leslie A.; Bassford, Tamsen L.; Reyna, Valerie F.; Shisslak, Catherine M.; Germain, Patricia A.; Reed, Kathryn L. 2003. Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Academic medicine, 78(5):500-508. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200305000-00015.
Wuchty, Stefan; Jones, Benjamin y Uzzi, Brian. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827):1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Yildirim, T. Murat; Eslen-Ziya, Hande. 2021. The differential impact of COVID-19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown. Gender, Work, & Organization, 28(S1):243-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12529
Zeng, Xiao H.; Duch, Jordi; Sales-Pardo, Marta; Moreira, João A.; Radicchi, Filippo; Ribeiro, Haroldo V.; Woodruff, Teresa K. y Amaral, Luís A.N. 2016. Differences in collaboration patterns across discipline, career stage, and gender. PLoS Biology, 14(11): e1002573. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002573