No. 18 (2025): Miscelánea
Artículos

Comparative study on the discourse regarding the bodies of pregnant women on social media platforms in China and Spain

Yiyan Zhang
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Published June 30, 2025

Keywords:

body, feminism, motherhood, pregnancy, childbirth
How to Cite
Zhang, Y. (2025). Comparative study on the discourse regarding the bodies of pregnant women on social media platforms in China and Spain. Journal of Feminist, Gender and Women Studies, (18), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.15366/jfgws2025.18.004

Abstract

In recent years, narratives about motherhood and the representation of the bodies of pregnant women have received increasing attention. This study focuses on a comparative analysis between China and Spain, adopting as a theoretical framework the feminist ideas about the body by Simone de Beauvoir, Judith Butler, and Iris Marion Young, among others, as well as the body theories of Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, among others. Through a narrative-discursive research approach, selected texts published on digital platforms (Instagram, YouTube, Xiaohongshu, and Bilibili) over the last three years are examined with the aim of analyzing the shared experiences of pregnant women and new mothers. The study addresses three key aspects: 1. Discourse on physical pain in pregnant and postpartum women; 2. Subjectivity and objectification of the body during pregnancy and childbirth; 3. Obstetric violence: the body that stirs emotions, empowerment, and disempowerment. The results show that, although in both China and Spain the predominant narratives highlight the happiness and personal fulfillment associated with motherhood, they also reflect the pains and discomforts experienced during the process of pregnancy and childbirth. However, there are significant differences in the visibility of criticisms and complaints related to obstetric violence. The analysis reveals tensions between patriarchal social norms and the demands for bodily autonomy of pregnant women, as well as cultural differences in the objectification of the body and emotional expression during pregnancy and childbirth. In the discussion, the influences of the historical contexts of Spain and China on the construction of the ideology of motherhood are analyzed, which allows us to understand how these narratives are influenced by specific historical, cultural, and social factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beauvoir, Simone de. 2008. El segundo sexo (2a ed.). Madrid: Cátedra.

Bohren, Meghan A; Vogel, Joshua. P; Hunter, Erin. C; Lutsiv, Olha; Makh, Suprita K; Souza, João Paulo; Aguiar, Carolina; Saraiva Coneglian, Fernando; Luíz Araújo Diniz, Alex; Tunçalp, Özge; Javadi, Dena; Oladapo, Olufemi, T; Khosla, Rajat; Hindin,Michelle J; Metin y Gülmezoglu, A. Michelle. 2015. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Medicine, 12(6): e1001847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical reason: On the theory of action (R. Johnson, Trans.). Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999. Meditaciones pascalianas. Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.

Braun, Virginia y Clarke, Victoria. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Browne, Victoria. 2016. ‘The money follows the mum’: Maternal power as consumer power. Radical Philosophy, 199. https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/commentary/the-money-follows-the-mum

Butler, Judith. 2011. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828274

Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (10th anniversary ed.). London: Routledge.

Chaillet, Nils; Dumont, Alexandre; Abrahamowicz, Michal; Pasquier, Jean-Charles; Audibert, Francois; Monnier, Patricia; Abenhaim, Haim. A; Dubé, Eri; Dugas, Marylèn; Burne, Rebecca y Fraser, Wiliam. 2015. A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cesarean delivery rates in Quebec. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(18): 1710-1721. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1407120

Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Declercq, Eugene. R; Sakala, Carol; Corry, Maureen. P; Applebaum, Sandra y Herrlich, Ariel. (2014). Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mothers (SM) III: Pregnancy and Birth: Report of the Third National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 23(1): 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.9

Descartes, René. 2008. Meditations on first philosophy: With selections from the objections and replies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Women and war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Firestone, Shulamith. 2003. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Foucault, Michel. 1995a. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Foucault, Michel. 1995b. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. 2003. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London: Psychology Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2012. The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Fox, Bonnie y Worts, Diana. 1999. Revisiting the Critique of Medicalized Childbirth: A Contribution to the Sociology of Birth. Gender and Society, 13(3): 326-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013003004

Freedman, Lynn. P; Ramsey, Kate; Abuya, Timothy; Bellows, Ben; Ndwiga, Charity; Warren, Charlotte E; Kujawski, Staphanie; Moyo, Wema; Kruk, Magaret E y Mbaruku, Godfrey. 2014. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: A research, policy and rights agenda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(12): 915-917. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.137869

Garthus-Niegel, Susan; von Soest, Tilmann; Vollrath, Margarete E y Eberhard-Gran, Malin. 2013. The impact of subjective birth experiences on post-traumatic stress symptoms: A longitudinal study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 16(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-012-0301-3

Gill, Rosalind y Orgad, Shani. 2018. The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’ to #MeToo. Sexualities, 21(8): 1313-1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718794647

Goberna-Tricas, Josefina y Biurrun-Garrido, Ainoa. 2020. El alivio del dolor en el parto. Empoderamiento y vulnerabilidad de las mujeres en la toma de decisiones. Estudio cualitativo. MUSAS. Revista de Investigación en Mujer, Salud y Sociedad, 5(1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1344/musas2020.vol5.num1.5

Haraway, Donna. 2013. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. En Stryker, Susan y Whittle, Stephen (eds.) The Transgender Studies Reader, 103-118. London: Routledge.

Hennink, Monique M; Kaiser, Bonnie N y Marconi, Vincent C. 2017. Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4): 591-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

Hodnett, Ellen D; Gates, Simon; Hofmeyr G, J; Sakala, Carol y Justus Hofmeyr, G. 2003. Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3: CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766

Lagan, Biege. M; Sinclair, Marlene y Kernohan George, W. 2010. Internet use in pregnancy informs women’s decision making: A web-based survey. Birth, 37: 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00390.x

Lalor, Joan. G; Begley, Cecily M y Galavan, Eoin. 2008. A grounded theory study of information preference and coping styles following antenatal diagnosis of foetal abnormality. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(2): 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04778.x

Lee, Linda. Y. K y Holroyd, Eleanor. 2009. Evaluating the effect of childbirth education class: A mixed-method study. International Nursing Review, 56(3): 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00701.x

Ley Orgánica 1/2023, de 28 de febrero, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2010, de 3 de marzo, de salud sexual y reproductiva y de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Boletín Oficial del Estado. núm. 51, de 1 de marzo de 2023.

Ley Orgánica 10/2022, de 6 de septiembre, de garantía integral de la libertad sexual. Boletín Oficial del Estado. núm. 215, de 07 de septiembre de 2022.

Low, Lisa. K y Moffat, Amy. 2006. Every Labor is Unique: But “Call When Your Contractions are 3 Minutes Apart”. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 31(5): 307. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200609000-00009

Lupton, Deborah. 2016. The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: A focus group study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1): 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0971-3

Malinen, Sanna. 2015. Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in human behavior, 46: 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004

Martin, Karin A. 2003. Giving Birth Like A Girl. Gender y Society, 17(1): 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202238978

Medina-Serdán, Erica. 2013. Diferencias entre la depresión postparto, la psicosis postparto y la tristeza postparto. Perinatología y reproducción humana, 27(3): 185-193.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The primacy of perception: And other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice y Smith, Colin. 2006. Phenomenology of perception: An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

Miller, Suellen; Abalos, Edgardo; Chamillard, Monica; Ciapponi, Agustin; Colaci, Daniela; Comandé, Daniel; Diaz, Virginia; Geller, Stacie; Hanson, Claudia; Langer, Ana; Manuelli, Victoria; Millar, Kathryn; Morhason-Bello, Imran; Castro, Cynthia Pileggi; Pileggi, Vicky. Nogueira Pileggi; Robinson, Nuriya; Skaer, Michelle; Souza, João. Paulo; Vogel, Joshua. P y Althabe, Fernando. 2016. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: A pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. The Lancet, 388(10056): 2176-2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6

Ministerio de Sanidad. 2020. Atención perinatal en España: Análisis de los recursos físicos, humanos, actividad y calidad de los servicios hospitalarios, 2010-2018. Ministerio de Sanidad. https://www.sanidad.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/Informe_Atencion_Perinatal_2010-2018.pdf

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2006. La voluntad de poder. Madrid: Editorial Edaf.

Oakley, Ann. 1980. Women Confined: Towards a Sociology of Childbirth. New York: Schocken Books.

Palomar Verea, Cristina. 2004. “Malas madres”: la construcción social de la maternidad. Debate Feminista, 30. https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2004.30.1046

Reed, Rachel; Sharman, Racheal y Inglis, Christian. 2017. Women’s descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1197-0

Rich, Adrienne. 2019. Nacemos de mujer. La maternidad como experiencia e institución. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

Riessman, Cathrine Kohler. 2003. Analysis of personal narratives. En Holstein, James A y Gubrium, Jaber F (eds.) Inside interviewing, 331-346. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984492.n16

Rodríguez Mir, Javier y Martínez Gandolfi, Alejandra. 2022. La violencia obstétrica: Una práctica invisibilizada en la atención médica en España. Gaceta Sanitaria, 35: 211-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.06.019

Ruhl, Lealle. 2002. Dilemmas of the will: Uncertainty, reproduction, and the rhetoric of control. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(3): 641-663. https://doi.org/10.1086/337940

Sadler, Michelle; JDS Santos, Marío; Ruiz-Berdún, Dolores; Leiva Rojas, Gonzalo; Skoko, Elena; Gillen, Patricia y Clausen, Jette A. 2016. Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: Addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reproductive Health Matters, 24(47): 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002

Talmon, Anat y Ginzburg, Karni. 2018. “Who does this body belong to?” The development and psychometric evaluation of the Body Experience during Pregnancy Scale. Body Image, 26: 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.05.002

Tao, Yanlan. 2012. ??????“??”???——?????????????. ??????, 0(1): 86-96.

Thomson, Gill y Downe, Soo. 2008. Widening the trauma discourse: The link between childbirth and experiences of abuse. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 29(4): 268-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802545453

Timmermans, Stefan y Tavory, Iddo. 2012. Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3): 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

Young, Iris Marion. 2005. Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation. En Young, Iris Marion (Ed.) On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays, 46-62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195161920.003.0004

Zeng, Yingchun; Cui, Ying y Li, Jie. 2015. Prevalence and predictors of antenatal depressive symptoms among Chinese women in their third trimester: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry, 15: 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0452-7

Zhang, Yilin. 2022. ?????????????????53%?36%????????. ????. Consultado el 02/04/2025. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_20247983

Zimmerman, Marc A. 2000. Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. En Rappaport, Julian y Seidman, Edward (Eds.) Handbook of Community Psychology, 43-63. Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2